![]() |
Ann ParadisM.S. July 2003, co-advised with S. Louda Currently a PhD student at: University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Email: annieparadis@yahoo.com |
Protocols used to evaluate potential insect biological control agents involve experiments designed to test the diet breadth of the insect, its oviposition preference, and larval preference and performance. These methods alone have proven insufficient in the case of the flowerhead weevil Rhinocyllus conicus. R. conicus was introduced to the U.S. in 1969 from its native European range in order to control musk thistle (Carduus nutans), a serious weed found in range lands. Overwintered adults emerge in early spring to mate and oviposit on the undersides of flowerheads. Larvae burrow into the flowerhead and feed on receptacle tissue and seeds, emerging as adults 6-9 weeks later and leaving the remaining seeds inviable.
In 1993, the weevil was discovered on Platte thistle (PL: Cirsium canescens),
a native North American species found only in prairies in the Great Plains on
sandy soils. Since that time it has been decreasing the population density of
this thistle in Nebraska. Many other native thistles in the Midwest, California,
and Canada support the complete development of R. conicus, yet presently
no data exist to determine if their population densities are affected. Currently,
the insect continues to be redistributed across the country. Two possible hypotheses
explaining the observed host range expansion are:
The objectives of my research are:
1) Determine the extent of genetic variation present in R. conicus,
and if genetic sub-structuring exists.
2) Determine whether there is an association between haplotype of the weevil
and host plant. In other words, are only certain haplotypes responsible for
non-target feeding?
